Vote YES on Prop 420

Scottsdale Proposition 420 makes a small, but critical, change to our Scottsdale City Charter in order to protect our preserve. It guarantees that any construction in the McDowell Sonoran Preserve, or spending of Preserve Funds, other than for trails, trailheads, maintenance, or restoration, MUST go to a vote of Scottsdale citizens.

A YES vote to Proposition 420 leaves in place the Preserve’s current management structure. The McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission and experienced city staff remain responsible for the Preserve’s daily operations. Access for first responders, remediation efforts, and expansion of parking facilities at existing trailheads are ALL permitted.

A YES vote to Prop 420 protects the Preserve from development. The charter change won’t prohibit Scottsdale’s City Council from proposing to build a Desert Edge — it mandates that voters get to make the final decision. “Our Preserve, Our Vote”. This is a fair compromise that respects citizens’ authority over land we taxed ourselves to buy, and allows Council the chance to propose development not authorized on the 1998 or 2004 ballots.

A YES vote to 420 maintains Preserve access for all, supports current educational programming, and keeps entry to the Preserve free of charge.The Preserve has three magnificent interpretive trails, at Gateway, Brown’s Ranch, and Lost Dog trailheads, which are accessible to people with disabilities. The McDowell Sonoran Conservancy offers a robust schedule of free, hands-on, educational opportunities for people of all ages and levels of experience. These events take place in classrooms, seated under shade at the trailheads, and in the field. You simply need to get out of your car to enjoy the Preserve for free. The Conservancy is a 700+ volunteer, non-profit organization that works cooperatively with the City of Scottsdale, and does not cost the City a dime. The Desert Edge is proposed to have a $6 million annual budget and a $1.8 – $3 million annual operations deficit.

Our YES to 420 community believes in inclusiveness. We’ve heard from fellow citizens who think that the Preserve should provide more opportunities for all people to enjoy it. The day after this election, I vow to reach out to organizations like Ability 360 to continue this conversation and engage the thousands of members of our online and offline NoDDC and Protect Our Preserve PAC communities. First though, we must ensure that the rights of every Scottsdale voter are secured.

Yes, there are those who oppose Prop 420. Most of the well-connected advocates for the Desert Edge development recently submitted comments for publication in the upcoming election’s official ballot pamphlet. It seems they have two main contentions to “YES to 420.”

First, the Desert Edge advocates say Prop 420 keeps people out of the Preserve. This is not true. The free access we all enjoy to the Preserve will continue. However, if a Desert Edge is constructed in the Preserve, one barrier Scottsdale citizens and visitors will have is its $57 daily admission fee for a family of four, as proposed in the Desert Edge’s business plan.

Second, opponents claim that Prop 420 will cripple the management of the Preserve. I wonder if they have even read the proposition? Here is a link to the actual textAs you can easily see in this very short document, there is nothing in Prop 420 that would make any change to the current management or operations of the Preserve.  Maintenance is permitted, restoration is allowed, new trails can be fashioned, parking expanded if needed, and management will continue to be overseen by city staff, City Council, and the citizen-led McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission.

YES to 420. OUR Preserve, OUR Vote! Protect OUR Preserve!

Why We Oppose the Desert Discovery Center\Edge

Protect OUR Preserve oppose the Desert Edge because it will spend $68,000,000 of future sales taxes to build a 120,000 sq ft. tourism event center inside our nature Preserve, that will include a restaurant and 60 evening events per year. It will change the ordinances protecting our Preserve to open its entire 30,000 acres up to future commercial development. Scottsdale citizens voted five times to tax themselves $1.7 billion dollars to preserve this land, and our City Charter guarantees this commercial venture must go to a vote of the people.

This large hi-tech museum was first discussed in 2010, 2011 and 2012. However, it was never moved forward because City Council understood that the public monies used on public lands needed the public’s approval. Scottsdale had other pressing infrastructure needs, and the project was shelved. Indeed, in the upcoming 2018 election our City Council plans to ask the taxpayers for $350,000,000 in new bonds, some of which will go to repair bridges that have literally been closed due to lack of repairs.

What has changed such that the Desert Edge is moving forward with only a simple majority of four City Councilpeople? In 2015 DDC’s zoning attorney, who doesn’t even live in Scottsdale, concocted a legal theory that a vote was no longer required. The people behind the DDC then conducted an extensive campaign of illegal lobbying of City Council, staff, and the public. They are barred from this type of activity since they are organized as a 501(c)(3) non-profit. We have filed an extensive complaint with the IRS to have their tax-exempt status revoked.

Supporters of the project have claimed that its always been planned. This is nonsense. The 2004 ballot package that funded most of our Preserve says absolutely nothing about museums or tourist attractions. That same ballot only empowered City Council to make improvements “thereto” the Preserve which further the concept of public access – trailheads, parking, water fountains. The lobbyists behind the DDC are seeking improvements “thereon”:  buildings, attractions, construction. We have raised over $100,000 and sued the City on this legal distinction.

This is a critical topic for environmentalists, as nationwide cities and states seek to exploit this legal nuance to use public lands for commercial development. If the DDC is built, there will be no legal protections for future commercial projects such as hotels, condos and jeep tours.

The multiple legal issues notwithstanding, our financial experts predict the Desert Edge will lose $3 to $5 million dollars annually, which must be subsidized by the taxpayers. The DDC business plan has three huge flaws.

  1. It has wildly optimistic attendance estimates of 306,000 visitors per year. This makes it nearly on par with the long-established Desert Botanical Garden and Tucson’s Desert Museum, which both average  approximately 375,000 annual visitors. The DDC predicts more visitors than the Musical Instrument Museum and Taliesin West combined.
  2. Dramatically underestimated fundraising needs. The DDC business plan says it can be profitable with only 27% of its income from annual fundraising. However, the same business plan states the DDC’s direct comps (the Botanical Garden, the Desert Museum, etc) require 37% fundraising. And, the “science museum” sector as a whole requires a whopping 52% income from fundraising.
  3. Extreme overestimate of volunteer support and underestimate of staffing costs. The business plan requires 300 volunteers, and budgets only one $35,000/year employee to manage them.

Additionally, feedback from both tourists and residents is consistent that the project’s reliance on digital screens and virtual exhibits make it inauthentic. Visitors repeatedly tell us that they come to see the real desert. The price tag of $57 for a family of four is excessive, when the real Preserve can be seen for free and enjoyed by everyone from the handicapped to hardcore hikers. There has only been one study in 2013 on the impact to the Tourism industry, and it states that the project will have minimal impact on additional hotel stays. The DDC’s promised educational component for local youth was widely dismissed, as only 11 Scottsdale teachers attended the DDC’s curriculum workshop even after being granted $500 to teach the program. Finally, the curriculum was bought off-the-shelf from ASU’s Lisa Hermann, who just recently led the all-volunteer McDowell Sonoran Conservancy’s free educational programs for area youth. In short, we already have everything the Desert Edge would offer: the desert, the tourists, and the education. The Desert Edge is nothing more than a big-government pet project that will spend $68,000,000 with very little to show in return.

YES to 420. OUR Preserve, OUR Vote! Protect OUR Preserve!

Who We Are

NoDDC and Protect Our Preserve PAC are the leading groups opposing the Desert Edge. The groups formed independently, but have united in their efforts to keep the future of the Preserve and the Preserve Fund in the hands of the citizens. Our 300 volunteers canvassed the City for 6 months, and collected 37,608 signatures of Scottsdale voters. We have received $50,000 in donations. We are led by a team of dedicated volunteers with experience in law, finance, business, government and real estate. We are not a “No” group. We have united Scottsdale around our message. 

YES on 420. Our Preserve, Our Vote. Protect Our Preserve.